On Github.com, searching for "kronosnet" turns up two repositories:
https://github.com/kronosnet/kronosnet
and
https://github.com/fabbione/kronosnet
Which is the correct repository? Why have two? Can one be decommissioned?
On 20/02/17 01:26 PM, Michael Jones wrote:
On Github.com, searching for "kronosnet" turns up two repositories:
https://github.com/kronosnet/kronosnet
and
https://github.com/fabbione/kronosnet
Which is the correct repository? Why have two? Can one be decommissioned?
Would it be worth standardizing under Clusterlabs?
On 2/20/2017 7:33 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 20/02/17 01:26 PM, Michael Jones wrote:
On Github.com, searching for "kronosnet" turns up two repositories:
https://github.com/kronosnet/kronosnet
and
https://github.com/fabbione/kronosnet
Which is the correct repository? Why have two? Can one be decommissioned?
Keep using /fabbione/ for now.
Would it be worth standardizing under Clusterlabs?
No, knet is not just about clusters. It has other use cases too.
Michele and I started to transition it under /kronosnet/ umbrella, but we never got to complete it for one reason or another and somehow it got lost in the noise of important bug fixes.
Once we move to /kronosnet/ we will remove /fabbione/ and announce it.
Fabio
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto fabbione@fabbione.net wrote:
On 2/20/2017 7:33 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 20/02/17 01:26 PM, Michael Jones wrote:
On Github.com, searching for "kronosnet" turns up two repositories:
https://github.com/kronosnet/kronosnet
and
https://github.com/fabbione/kronosnet
Which is the correct repository? Why have two? Can one be
decommissioned?
Keep using /fabbione/ for now.
Would it be worth standardizing under Clusterlabs?
No, knet is not just about clusters. It has other use cases too.
Michele and I started to transition it under /kronosnet/ umbrella, but we never got to complete it for one reason or another and somehow it got lost in the noise of important bug fixes.
Once we move to /kronosnet/ we will remove /fabbione/ and announce it.
Fabio
Thank you for the guidance
On 2/21/2017 6:01 PM, Michael Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net mailto:fabbione@fabbione.net> wrote:
On 2/20/2017 7:33 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 20/02/17 01:26 PM, Michael Jones wrote: >> On Github.com, searching for "kronosnet" turns up two repositories: >> >> https://github.com/kronosnet/kronosnet <https://github.com/kronosnet/kronosnet> >> >> and >> >> https://github.com/fabbione/kronosnet <https://github.com/fabbione/kronosnet> >> >> Which is the correct repository? Why have two? Can one be decommissioned? Keep using /fabbione/ for now. > > Would it be worth standardizing under Clusterlabs? > No, knet is not just about clusters. It has other use cases too. Michele and I started to transition it under /kronosnet/ umbrella, but we never got to complete it for one reason or another and somehow it got lost in the noise of important bug fixes. Once we move to /kronosnet/ we will remove /fabbione/ and announce it. Fabio
Thank you for the guidance
The repos has moved to /kronosnet/ now, but there is no need to update anything in your git config or checkouts. github does automatically redirect you to the right place.
Cheers Fabio
On 21/02/17 02:40 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
On 2/20/2017 7:33 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 20/02/17 01:26 PM, Michael Jones wrote:
On Github.com, searching for "kronosnet" turns up two repositories:
https://github.com/kronosnet/kronosnet
and
https://github.com/fabbione/kronosnet
Which is the correct repository? Why have two? Can one be decommissioned?
Keep using /fabbione/ for now.
Would it be worth standardizing under Clusterlabs?
No, knet is not just about clusters. It has other use cases too.
Michele and I started to transition it under /kronosnet/ umbrella, but we never got to complete it for one reason or another and somehow it got lost in the noise of important bug fixes.
Once we move to /kronosnet/ we will remove /fabbione/ and announce it.
Fabio
Fine. We know you don't love us anymore. ;)